<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Jun 6, 2008, at 10:35 AM, <a href="mailto:donovan@hydrotik.com">donovan@hydrotik.com</a> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0; ">I also think it fits in line with Moses’ desire for Go to be adopted as an Adobe standard.<br></span></blockquote></div><br><div>Well just to clear the air I'm not actually hoping for Adobe to pick up Go. I'd like to see it succeed at the OS community level before any such considerations would be proposed. (My proposal to them for a standard was a different thing, it was for a complete animation system that could live outside all products and work with javascript, after effects, flash, flex. Go is more like a "voluntary AS3 animation standard" that could be adopted by the community at large as an alternative to an Adobe solution.)</div><div><br></div><div>m</div></body></html>