<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Working on it, I definitely intend to create some type of semi-open SVN, where everyone could have their own branch. Not sure if that will be possible on googlecode or not.... but Graeme has his own SVN and we could always do a custom setup if needed. Please let me know if you have a preference or want to get involved in helping research all that stuff.<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div>- m</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div><br><div><div>On Feb 22, 2008, at 2:15 AM, Aram wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">Can't wait to get it!<br><br>Is there a plan to store and share custom third party tweens anywhere?<br><br>Thanks<br><br>On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Moses Gunesch <<a href="mailto:moses@goasap.org">moses@goasap.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Okay I have an idea on the GC issue. Although I don't want to go the route<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">of full instance-management (like Fuse had), I do see that these types of<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">utilities are a lot more user friendly if they can be used without storing<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">references to them. So I'm going to add a feature that stashes a reference<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">to instances while they are playing.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Also regarding loop, that is a good feature suggestion – I had tons of<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">requests for that with Fuse so I know it's widely needed, I'll look into<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">adding that as well.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">I've gotten a really nice update together that should be ready pretty quick<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">here.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">- m<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">On Feb 22, 2008, at 1:37 AM, Aram wrote:<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">I pulled the latest revision 24 from svn. It is indeed 0.4.1<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">If I remove the weak reference on: SequenceBase - Line: 333<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">step.addEventListener(SequenceEvent.ADVANCE, onStepEvent, false, 0, true);<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">-TO-<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">step.addEventListener(SequenceEvent.ADVANCE, onStepEvent);<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">It works, not sure if that breaks something else though for future GC.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">On another note, a RepeatingSequence. To achieve, I subclassed<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Sequence and overrode stop, adding in a skipTo(0).<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Would something like a repeat flag on Sequence ever make it into the<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">core? Or we should just extend for stuff like that?<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Thanks,<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Aram<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Moses Gunesch <<a href="mailto:moses@goasap.org">moses@goasap.org</a>> wrote:<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Which version of Go are you using (please be sure to test with 0.4.1), and<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">which weakReference param at which line?<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Thanks,<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">moses<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">On Feb 22, 2008, at 12:30 AM, Aram wrote:<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Thanks for the great work first off.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Have a quick question regarding sequencing.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">If I create a new sequence within a method, only the first item fires.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">The complete event never make up to PlayableGroup. If I remove the<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">weak listener param though it moves up and works as though the<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">sequence was declared outside the method.<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Just wondering if this is the preferred behavior or not?<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Thanks again<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></div></div></body></html>